Click Here to Visit The
Abigail Adams Project
Website
www.AbigailAdamsProject.org
Evolution
Evolution vs. Creation: The Great
Debate
The Evolution vs.. Creation debate is often
referred to as the "Great Debate." It's the emotion-packed question of "Origins" -- why, how, and where did
everything come from? 20th century science has made the compelling discovery that, at some point, the universe
began. Both sides of the Great Debate now agree that the universe has not existed eternally. However, this is where
the agreement ends.
Read more http://www.allaboutcreation.org/evolution-vs-creation.htm
Has Critical Thinking Been Banned from the Classroom? (this is an
article written by my daughter and will need its own page to link to on the site. The article is on the next
page of this to do list)
Evolution Deceit
http://www.evolutiondeceit.com/chapter9.php
Discover the TRUTH about the origin of life and the
universe
http://www.buzzplant.com/illustra/ecard2/
The Hoax called Evolution
The Latest Evolution Fraud
Suggested Books
The Great Evolution Curriculum Hoax
by Randall Hedtke
Science Research Proves Evolution Hoax: The
Conflagration, When Parallel Universes Merge by Bruce McKay
The Late Great Ape Debate
by Bayard
Taylor
The Exchange of Truth: Liberating the World from
the Lie of Evolution by
David E Shormann
Has Critical Thinking Been Banned from the Classroom?
By Cassie Fletcher
Posted May, 2005
Mike Romigh, a radio talk show host on KDKA in
Pittsburgh, PA, interviewed
Nick Matzke from the National Center for Scientific Education on Wednesday night to discuss a Kansas court case that would place the study of
Intelligent Design along side of the study of Evolution in public schools. Mr. Matzke made the case
against intelligent design stating that it was simply the creationists attempt to bring God back into the
classroom. He insisted that it was not a viable theory and that it should not be discussed or even
presented.
Rather disgruntled by Mr. Matzke’s opinion as well as the fact that
Mr. Romigh did nothing but agree with, and validate, everything Mr. Matzke expressed, my mother, felt
compelled to call in and convey her views on the subject.
“The issue is not whether evolution is being taught, but how it is
being taught,” she said after a few minutes of discussion. “What disturbs me is that evolution is being
taught as a doctrinal fact. Our children are being told that evolution is right and everything else is wrong.
Instead of being told what to think and believe we should allow students the opportunity to express their own
views and opinions on which theories make the most sense to them. You could even have them write research
papers on the various theories.”
Mr. Matzke responded by stating that if we allow just any theory to be
presented in the classroom we will soon begin studying such things as big foot.
My mother countered with, “That’s fine. Open the classroom as a place
of thought and free expression of ideas. A place where students are presented with all theories and allowed
the opportunity to determine for themselves, through research, experimentation, and data, whether or not they
are viable.”
Then Mr. Matzke astounded my mother and I both when he stated, “We
just can’t open (the classroom) up to critical thinking.”
I was completely taken aback. Is not critical thinking the very thing
we are encouraged to employ in both the scientific field as well as in the classroom? Then again, thinking
back on my own educational experience, I did begin to notice a gradual change. For example, when I was in
elementary school and was asked to express my opinion on a specific issue I was allowed to express it without
criticism, or negative consequences.
By the time I entered high school things had obviously changed when my
ninth grade science teacher asked me to express my personal opinion on how and why Pangea separated. The
answer I gave had nothing to do with plate tectonics or the rotation of the earth’s core. Instead my answer
was based on things I had learned in Sunday school because that was my honest opinion. I was given a C-minus
on that assignment as well as a written note scribbled in the corner that read:
“You have a very interesting view. However, your answer was to be
based on the study of plate tectonics. So, to my regret, I am not permitted to give you full
marks.”
I was a bit irritated to say the least. After all, who was he to ask
my opinion and then tell me that it was wrong? It’s my view, and how could my view be
wrong? If
he wanted me to give a certain answer he should have asked for that instead of my opinion.
Now the focus of this article is
not theology, creationism, or even intelligent design. It is about a student’s right to express their own
theories and to be given the opportunity to research, study, and collect data so that they may determine for
themselves which theories are viable; thus creating an environment of science, which according to Mr. Matzke’s
definition is the study and explanation of facts based on theory.
So I, as a student of learning, am not asking for past theories to be
discarded, I am asking for them to be a part of a larger collection. After all, the only proven truth to
evolution is that science continues to evolve. What may have been considered as fact last year could be
replaced for another theory that makes better sense this year. I would therefore conclude the classroom to be
the most logical and productive forum to explore, and express, such concepts.
Cassie Fletcher is the daughter of Kimberly Fletcher, president/founder of Homemakers for
America Inc. Cassie spent nine years in public school then transferred to home education in High
School. Cassie studied for three years in an accelerated home school program which offered her the
opportunity to graduate a year early.
Cassie is now 17 years-old, attends college in Dayton Ohio and interns with HFA, serving as assistant to
the President.
Click Here to Visit The
Abigail Adams Project
Website
www.AbigailAdamsProject.org
|